“The U.S. central bank forecast one or two more hikes for 2018.
Assuming no additional stimulus in 2020, the fading of the U.S. fiscal sugar-rush after 2018-2019 could lead to withdrawal symptoms that could exacerbate a cyclical slowdown.
The U.S. could target an additional $200 billion in Chinese goods, followed by another $300 billion – bringing duties on a total of $550 billion Chinese products, which is more than the $506 billion the U.S. imported from China in 2017
In the US, headline inflation is projected by the IMF to increase to 2.5% from 2.1%.
The IEA predicts the U.S. will add 1.7 million barrels per day in 2018, followed by another 1.2 mb/d in 2019.
Being well overdue for a recession in the US, the unbridled optimism of global investors will eventually end, once they consider the plethora of rising risks.
Achieving policy objectives will become more challenging from 2020 amid a technical recession in the US and a faster deceleration in Chinese economic growth rates.
In the next three years, a rising amount of bonds maturing within one year entails rollover risk if financial conditions tighten abruptly.
A recession in the US will cause economic growth in Canada to slow to a little above 1% in 2020.
The risk of a recession really picks up after a year, or sometime in 2020 because that is when you start to see the fiscal stimulus start to fade.
One change from recent years is that corporate car rental prices in North America are expected to rise by as much as 5 percent in 2018 due to operator issues.
The US stock market is on the brink of an imminent crash that could trigger another global recession.
Borrowing costs climb to a four-year high just as investors begin to anticipate a downturn in the global economy.
US rate hikes risk triggering a recession in 2019 or 2020 by putting the brakes on growth.
With unemployment at 4.1%, inflation fears are rising: Typically, the Federal Reserve starts to increase interest rates to slow the economy and push inflation back into its lair – but in doing so, the Fed raises the risk of recession and pushing down already lofty stock markets.”
6) Anticipate changing circumstances and economic cycles.
7) Persist and pivot to navigate external threats and opportunities.
17) Sketch out your trajectory in 5-year timeframes.Will we fall into another recession?Absolutely.Will you be ready this time with future-proofed strategies?
DOUBLE AND TRIPLE CHECK YOUR SCENARIOS WITH A FINANCIAL PLANNER WHOSE FIDUCIARY DUTY IS TO YOU!
Option Four – Stay in your home, invest your equity
Reverse Mortgage or
Home Equity Line Of Credit (HELOC)
HELOC rate is 8.0%; this is based on a loan for 80% of the home’s value and is .25% below prime (Source: Countrywide).
Assume that there is one refinance after 10 years.
HELOC mortgage interest deduction is limited to the interest on the first $100,000 of the loan.
Assumes home is sold off to pay the loan; if another mortgage is taken out, transaction costs could be lower.
Allows both couples to live in their home.
Works well when the home continues to appreciate in value.
The HELOC debt is covered by the increase in value.
After paying off the credit line heirs receive substantial legacies
Remember both couples could deduct the mortgage interest by itemizing on Federal taxes attributable to the first $100,000 of the loan.
HELOC transaction costs are also quite low at about 1% of the loan and the credit line offers flexibility in timing any drawdown.
The costs and responsibility of home maintenance.
As cost of living expenses increase both couples may be tempted to spend down more than the initial 80% debt value ceiling.
Or, as their home value increases they may continually ramp up their debt.
Of course, they will need to make regular monthly payments on their HELOC or face the risk of foreclosure.
Reverse Mortgage scenarios:
Assumes that proposed legislation is enacted that would change housing limits to a national limit of $417,000.
Limit increases at 4% annually.
Assume current interest rate of 7% – includes the 6.5% interest rate and the .5% insurance premium.
Monthly servicing fee of $30/month is added annually.
This scenario assumes that interest rates stay fairly constant.
Reverse mortgage interest deduction is limited to the interest on the first $100,000 of the loan; accrued interest is deductible by the heirs in the year that it is paid.
It is assumed that the heirs will be able to deduct the mortgage interest in the year that it is paid, and that the heirs will be able to utilize $100,000 of that interest deduction.
The utility of the deduction will depend on the individual tax situation of the heirs.
Assume home is sold to pay off loan; if another mortgage is taken out, transaction costs could be different.
Enable these couples to receive regular payments (actually loans) secured against the value of their homes and be assured that they can remain in those homes for life.
Homeowners live in their homes and tap into their substantial amount of equity.
Depending on their age.
Prevailing interest rates.
As long as they live in their home, life is good.
No payments need to be made on the reverse mortgage (though they must, of course, cover the home’s routine expenses and maintain it).
Better still, loan payments to the borrower may feel — and function — like ordinary income, but they are not taxable income.
Under current law, payments received by a reverse mortgage borrower don’t count towards Medicaid resource limits provided they are spent each month and not accumulated.
Here’s the bonus while you live in your home.
They don’t count toward the income threshold for determining whether regular Social Security payments are subject to federal income tax.
Also, reverse mortgages do not count toward the $500,000 – $750,000 home equity test for nursing/long-term care assistance under Medicaid.
Here’s the bonus for your kids.
Heirs to a home carrying reverse mortgage debt do sell, they should be able to deduct the mortgage interest (subject to any applicable limitations).
During 2007 Fidelity cautioned.
Because the reverse mortgage market is still emerging, upfront costs are much higher than a HELOC — up to several percent of the loan value.
The product is complex and the amount available for lending is inversely correlated to interest rates — which are difficult to predict and impossible to control.
Are these five options the only scenarios for both couples?
It is possible to combine these strategies in various ways.
Both couples could choose to combine the first scenario,
Sell Home and Buy a Less Expensive Home, with either a HELOC or a Reverse Mortgage on the new home.
Why would this be in their best interests?
They could generate incremental cash flow.
Heirs would benefit from the new home.
Equity could be extracted for their comfort or future investments
But, here’s the kicker.
Time to age 94.
One couple’s planning horizon is 32 years while the other is just 19 years.
You need to take into account the difference in possible home values, cash flows and other variables.
Think of it this way — if these couples chose one of these options in the (year 2016) — the results we project would be realized for the Walkers (by 2035)… the Smiths would not see the results the table suggests until (2048 )— the last year of their 32-year planning horizon.
Since this age and timeframe difference is so substantial, the only meaningful comparisons to make are among each couple’s own options.
Remember, don’t rely solely on your home equity as a significant retirement funding source.
Recurring cyclical downturns in real estate can inflict severe damage.
Investment returns on residential real estate have been lower historically than
on stocks and bonds.
If you pour all your funds into your home you’ll have nothing left to invest for higher marginal returns.
Don’t count out the emotional components of owning a home.
The emotional aspects of homeownership can also present significant barriers to the use of home equity for retirees.
Whatever the financial case, the emotional investment involved can make it hard to sell, rent or float debt on a home after a lifetime of paying off mortgages — even if that strategy makes sense financially.
The comfort of living in a familiar home as one ages or the desire to leave the home’s full value to heirs compound many retirees reluctance to tap their home equity by either sale or leverage.
If you’ve planned well and acquired significant equity when reaching retirement age you’ve got multiple options for mobilizing it.
Decisions on precisely how to tap home equity require careful analysis and he financial and emotional trade-offs change as retirees age.
Non-financial personal preferences may quite reasonably trump sheer financial or cash flow benefits.
Peace of mind, convenience, familiarity are all real, if hard-to-quantify values.
Reverse mortgages do offer many advantages for retirees —
… notably, regular cash flows that do not count as taxable income.
But this market needs to mature.
High initial costs of reverse mortgages scare off many retirees.
Many fear losing their homes to the lender, even though there is no such risk.
The reverse mortgage market will likely grow substantially once upfront costs drop, securitization takes hold, and customer awareness of potential advantages grows.
With your financial planner double-check all of the
your spreadsheet calculations.
If the calculated risks are baked in, then go ahead with your eyes wide open.
Like all carpenters know, measure twice and cut one.
Pulling the trigger on any major decision like this one with consequences (intended or unintended) will significantly impact the rest of your life.
An excerpt from Book Four in “The Knowledge Path Series” dedicated to helping you find the place of your dreams in the Rocky Mountain State.